California Public Interest Energy Research

 

 

Overview

Automated Diagnostics

Advanced Load Controls

Alternative Cooling

Alternative Construction

Impact Assessment

Commission Sites

Related Research

Market Transformation

 



© 2002, Architectural Energy Corporation.
All Rights Reserved.

Funded by California Energy Commission's Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program

 Automated Diagnostics

P1. Rooftop Air Conditioining > Conclusions

Conclusions:
  • Applying automated FDD to packaged air conditioning units will significantly decrease energy use, improve indoor comfort conditions, and reduce maintenance costs. The FDD methods investigated in this project could be applied to cooling equipment that supplies about 60% of building mechanical cooling in California. Over 500,000 tons of air-conditioning are supplied using packaged units.
  • The new FDD method developed for simultaneous faults is applicable to packaged rooftop air-conditioners with fixed orifice and thermal expansion valves. Developing a technique applicable to thermal expansion valves increases the number of packaged units that can be served, as well as opening the possibility for application to walk-in refrigerated boxes.
  • Adoption of FDD for packaged air-conditioners should be promoted to end users, service contractors, and HVAC manufacturers. The economic benefits of applying this FDD system in California ranges between $4000 and $10,000 per packaged unit over a 10-year life span, which should provide the economic incentive to use FDD.
Commercialization Potential:

It is envisioned that the FDD methods would reside in the unit controller and use temperature measurements to continuously monitor performance to detect and diagnose faults. Field Diagnostic Services, Inc., a support contractor on the research project, is involved in developing FDD products, and Honeywell, Inc., a match fund provider on other projects within the program, participated in the field activities of this project. Both have expressed interest in further development of the automated FDD technology. FDSI is in discussions with other major controls manufacturers regarding development of diagnostic services and products from Project 2.1 research results.

Recommendations:
  • Additional research is needed in the areas of applying the de-coupling FDD technique online in field testing, improving the modeling approach based on manufacturer's data, continuing to improve the performance model, expanding the service cost database, and consider other control diagnostics.

  • Recruit commercialization partners to expand the market. Primarily HVAC unit manufacturers and control component manufacturers need to understand the benefits of the FDD technology and why they should sell it to their customers.
  • Establish incentive programs for mechanical contractors and building owners to promote acceptance and use of on-board diagnostics for rooftop units. This will assist in accelerating availability of units with FDD on- board.

  • Provide awareness training for building owners, mechanical contractors, and HVAC trade unions. Testing with field data revealed that many units have multiple concurrent faults, confirming evidence from other PIER studies that maintenance of rooftop units is generally lacking.
  • Develop automated follow up methods to ensure equipment functions as intended. The FDD methodology, along with increasingly sophisticated communications networks within buildings, should allow continuous or periodic reviews for equipment faults without visits to the site.
Benefits to California:

Based on new data regarding the characteristics of California building stock and statewide energy use, the projected benefits of this project are updated as follows:

The original baseline conditions and projected outcome were based on national estimates because there was no reliable data for California as a whole. During the course of the Program, the Commission has established a data set for California from which the original estimates can be improved. See Appendix I.

The new California data set established 10 end-use areas, including three of which may apply to packaged rooftop units: cooling, ventilation, and heating. The Commission used a national study [1] to estimate the types of cooling equipment used in California, which found that rooftop units provide 54% of the cooling end-use for buildings in the United States. Most rooftop units in California use natural gas for heating, although there are some climate zones in which heat pumps are used (estimated at about 7%, using data from [1]). Thus, the FDD methods investigated in this project could be applied to cooling equipment that supplies about 60% of building mechanical cooling in California. Heat pumps, in heating mode, account for 5% of energy used for heating.

Updated Baseline:

The GWh savings estimated in the original projected outcome was based on a baseline load of 74,677 GWh/yr for the entire State; the Commission's figure for Year 2000 is 91,771 GWh/yr. The California Commercial Electricity Consumption by Building Type in Year 2000 estimates that the cooling end-use consumed 15.5% of all electricity used in that year, or 14,255 GWh. Fifty-four percent of this figure, or 7698 GWh, may be attributed to DX rooftop units.

The cooling end-use is the primary target for the Project 2.1's technology. Proper functioning of the economizer, which affects the cooling end-use and the ventilation end-use, is a secondary target. The state-wide electric consumption for the ventilation end-use is 10% of the total, or 9,328 GWh/yr. Assuming that packaged AC units account for 54% of the ventilation energy used in the state, packaged air-conditioners account for additional 5,037 GWh/yr.

The installed cooling capacity of packaged air-conditioning units in California in Year 2000 is estimated to be 513,000 tons (refrigeration). Survey work sponsored under another PIER Program showed that packaged air conditioners in the range of 5 to 10 tons (refrigeration capacity) constitute about 70% of the installed units.

Updated Outcomes:

By 2010 the savings per year would be about 100 GWh for retrofit and new construction.

Back to Previous Page


Contact Us: ceceeb-contact@archenergy.com

Updated October 22, 2003