|
P2-4. Demonstration of the Whole
Building Diagnostician > Background
Objectives:
- Test and demonstrate automated commissioning
and diagnostics
using the Whole-Building
Diagnostician (WBD)
in actual buildings
with
actual operators
and energy service
providers
to:
- Prove WBD efficacy in automatically detecting
energy efficiency
and outside-air
supply
problems in buildings
- Test and demonstrate the ability of users
to interpret and
act upon the information
provided by the
tools to correct
building
operational problems
- Develop case studies of the impacts of using
the tools in terms
of the type and
number
of problems found,
the energy savings,
and
fresh air-supply
impacts of correcting
the
problems
- Provide feedback from users, based on their
experience with
the OAE/WBD, to guide development
and implementation
of the other tools in
the future, including
those in the program
plan.
Approach:
Using demonstration sites, this project demonstrated
the WBD's current
automated diagnostic tools
in three contexts:
- Single Building, Dedicated Operator: The single-building operator demonstration
took place at the Symphony Towers building
in San Diego, California, a 34-story 601,000
sq. ft., "Class-A", mixed-use development
located at the hub of downtown San Diego's
financial corridor. Symphony Towers was selected
for the demonstration because of its visibility
and energy conscious management. The management
team had aggressively pursued optimal equipment
performance and has accomplished numerous
lighting, mechanical, plumbing, and controls
enhancements.
The building's HVAC (heating, ventilating and air-conditioning) system
consists of two three-stage centrifugal chillers of 550 tons each, and
two natural gas hydronic boilers of 3,000 MBtu/hr each. Four variable-air-volume
air handlers with variable speed drives, equipped with enthalpy-controlled
economizers, serve the occupied space and variable speed drives. The air
handlers only supply cooling; no heating coil is present. The control system
is controlled manufactured by by a Johnson Controls Metasys building automation
system, and provides convenient on-demand access to data by the WBD via
a DDE (dynamic data exchange) server.
- Multi-Building, Dedicated Operator: The County of Alameda currently owns or
leases approximately 120 buildings consisting
of 6.2 million square feet of owned office
space and 1.1 million square feet of leased
office space. Among those buildings are a
jail, a number of courthouses, clinics, office
buildings and juvenile halls. The demonstration
sites consist of two courthouses and two
emergency buildings.
The building's HVAC system consists of hydronic systems with centrifugal
chillers, and natural gas hydronic boilers. Four large variable-air-volume
(VAV) air handlers with heating and cooling coils, differential dry-bulb
controlled economizers and variable speed drives serve the occupied space.
A direct digital control (DDC) system from CSI controls the HVAC systems,
which also provides a mechanism for trend logs.
- Mechanical Services Provider: Marina Mechanical, a mechanical services
company headquartered in Oakland, was the
demonstration partner. The firm provides
HVAC construction and maintenance services
to office and industrial building owners
in northern California. The demonstration
site selected by Marina Mechanical was the
Capitol Mall office building, located in
Sacramento. The Capitol Mall building is
an 18-story 385,000 square foot premier "Class
A" office building with integral covered
parking structure. In addition to office
space, the building houses a Café and a rooftop
terrace. The building was built in 1984 and
is located at 300 Capitol Mall, approximately
six blocks west of the State Capitol. The
building is an Environmental Protection Agency
"Energy Star" qualified building.
The demonstration included six air handlers
ranging in capacity from 40,000 to 100,000
cfm, with a total capacity of 380,000 cfm.
Data collected during
each demonstration
included (1) raw
metered data, (2) operator
usage, (3) problems
found by operators, (4)
problems they fixed
or tried to fix, and
(5) user opinions
of the WBD tools and problems
with them. Collected
Data was analyzed to
measure the success
of the WBD tools and
provide feedback
for future automated commissioning
and diagnostic tools,
including (1) user
satisfaction, (2)
user success in finding
problems using the
tools, (3) the number
of problems found
and fixed, and (4) cost
savings, cost to
fix problems, and fresh
air supply improvements.
Back to Previous Page
|